Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by law." It is actually perfectly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon with the prosecution against the petitioner and his previously mentioned mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined because of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
Intentional Murder: The true secret component of Section 302 PPC is the prerequisite of intention. It implies that the offender must have the intention to cause the death on the victim. Intent can be premeditated or may be formed at the moment in the crime.
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for that Supreme Court from the United States is accessible over the court’s website.
Individual researchers working on defined research projects meant for scholarly work can utilize the attached form (PDF) to request PACER fee exemptions from multiple courts.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a properly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
only around the ground of miscases remanded & only within the ground of misreading of evidence only on the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
Extra username and password are expected for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Accessing free case legislation sites in Pakistan is essential for legal professionals, students, and anybody seeking to understand Pakistani legal precedents.
Whilst a lot of websites offer free case regulation, not all are equally reliable. It’s important To guage the credibility of the source before relying on the information.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
A lessen court may well not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it really is unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. Should the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it may well either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow to get a judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
Within the United States, men and women are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their personal can remember one particular rule of thumb when it comes to referring to case law or precedent in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only for the case, but into the canadian case law database section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.